A New York University (NYU) professor has claimed that traditional bank lobbies are “panicking” over the rise of yield-bearing stablecoins, warning that the financial instruments could disrupt the traditional banking system.
Stablecoins and Their Growing Popularity
Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies designed to maintain a stable value, often pegged to a fiat currency like the U.S. dollar. Yield-bearing stablecoins go a step further, offering users interest on their holdings, similar to a savings account. These instruments have gained traction in recent years, with total market capitalization reaching over $100 billion, according to industry data.
Threat to Traditional Banks
NYU Stern School of Business professor Aswath Damodaran made the remarks in a recent interview, stating that bank lobbies are increasingly concerned about the impact of yield-bearing stablecoins. He explained that these digital assets pose a threat to traditional banks in two key ways:
Deposit Competition: Yield-bearing stablecoins offer higher interest rates than most traditional savings accounts, potentially attracting depositors away from banks.
Disintermediation: By allowing users to earn interest directly through decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, stablecoins bypass traditional banking intermediaries.
“Traditional banks are worried because stablecoins with yields are eating into their deposit base,” Damodaran said. “If people can get a better return on their money without going through a bank, why would they stay?”
Regulatory Uncertainty
The professor also highlighted the regulatory uncertainty surrounding yield-bearing stablecoins as a factor contributing to bank lobby concerns. While some stablecoins are regulated, others operate in a gray area, leading to fears of unfair competition.
“Regulators are still trying to figure out how to classify and regulate these instruments,” Damodaran noted. “Banks see this as an uneven playing field and are pushing for stricter regulations to level the competition.”
Industry Reactions
Bank lobbying groups have not explicitly confirmed feelings of “panic,” but they have been vocal in advocating for stricter regulations on stablecoins. The American Bankers Association (ABA) has called for stablecoin issuers to be subject to the same regulations as banks, arguing that this would ensure a level playing field and protect consumers.
Crypto industry advocates, on the other hand, argue that yield-bearing stablecoins offer valuable financial services to underserved populations and promote financial innovation. They contend that rather than fearing disruption, banks should adapt to the changing financial landscape.
What This Means for the Future
Damodaran’s comments come at a time when regulators around the world are grappling with how to regulate stablecoins. In the United States, lawmakers have proposed several bills aimed at regulating stablecoins, including the Stablecoin Innovation and Protection Act.
The professor predicts that the conflict between traditional banks and the crypto industry over yield-bearing stablecoins will intensify in the coming months. “This is a battle for the future of finance,” he said. “How regulators respond will shape the financial landscape for years to come.”
As the debate continues, one thing is clear: yield-bearing stablecoins have emerged as a significant force in the financial world, and their impact on traditional banking is likely to be felt for some time.
Related topic:
- Bitcoin price forecast: The price of Bitcoin has reached $103,688, with a weekly increase of 7.6%, showing an unstoppable trend. Will it reach a new high before June?
- The Ethereum Foundation has provided a $30 million grant to empower Ethereum, and the Anglo-American trade agreement has helped Ethereum approach $2,500
- OpenAI Returns to non-profit, AI Coin MIND of Pepe ICO Enters Countdown
