Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has publicly condemned the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for its continued assertion that XRP is a security, despite a recent court ruling stating otherwise. His comments follow the SEC’s involvement in the Bitnomial case, where the crypto derivatives exchange is contesting the SEC’s classification of XRP futures.
Garlinghouse’s Accusations Against the SEC
In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Garlinghouse expressed his frustration, labeling the SEC’s stance as “above the law.” He highlighted the agency’s apparent disregard for judicial decisions and its failure to recognize that XRP is not classified as a security, questioning the regulatory body’s commitment to upholding the law.
Bitnomial’s Legal Challenge
The Bitnomial case centers around the SEC’s claim that XRP futures fall under the category of “security futures,” subjecting them to more stringent regulations than those governed by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Bitnomial has argued that XRP should not be treated as a security since it has not been registered as such.
The exchange filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, asserting that the SEC’s requirement for them to register as a national securities exchange imposes an undue regulatory burden. In its complaint, Bitnomial pointed out that the SEC’s position contradicts the court’s previous ruling that XRP itself is not a security.
Legal Experts Weigh In on Regulatory Overreach
Legal experts and Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, have echoed Garlinghouse’s sentiments, expressing concerns over the SEC’s actions. Alderoty questioned the legitimacy of a regulatory body that chooses to ignore court rulings, suggesting that the SEC’s behavior raises serious constitutional issues. He emphasized that the agency’s post-court behavior reflects an attempt to enforce compliance through intimidation, disregarding the judicial outcome.
Pro-XRP lawyer Bill Morgan and other legal analysts have criticized the SEC for overstepping its authority and ignoring established legal precedents. John Deaton, who represented XRP holders in the Ripple case, also weighed in, asserting that the SEC’s conduct appears “arbitrary and capricious,” a term that denotes a serious legal standard. He referenced a recent incident involving the crypto firm Digital Licensing (Debt Box), where the SEC faced sanctions for misconduct, highlighting ongoing concerns regarding the agency’s regulatory practices.
Conclusion
The ongoing tension between Ripple, Bitnomial, and the SEC underscores a broader conflict within the cryptocurrency industry regarding regulatory clarity and enforcement. As legal challenges mount against the SEC’s stance on XRP, industry stakeholders are increasingly calling for a reevaluation of how digital assets are regulated in the United States.
Related topics:
Crypto Prices Today, October 10: BTC Slips Below $61K, Altcoins Tumble on PlusToken Related Selloff
Will Bitcoin Price Hit $150K in Q4? Expert Insights and Market Analysis
