According to on-chain detective ZachXBT’s disclosure on June 2nd, the associated address of Ross Ulbricht, the founder of the degenerated dark web trading platform “Silk Road”, suddenly received 300 Bitcoins (approximately 31.7 million US dollars) recently. It has sparked market disputes over the source of funds and compliance. ZachXBT pointed out through on-chain analysis that this transaction “is by no means a self-donation or accidental operation”, and it may involve complex asset traceability or legal procedures behind it.
On-chain anomaly: A long-forgotten address suddenly receives a huge amount of BTC
Blockchain data shows that the transfer occurred on May 31, with 300 bitcoins being transferred from an anonymous wallet to an address related to the Ubrich case (which had some of its assets seized by the US Department of Justice in 2013). It is worth noting that the receiving address has never had any transaction records since 2014. The Bitcoins transferred this time are all “antique coins” mined from 2012 to 2013, and the block height indicates that their history can be traced back to the active period of the Silk Road.
ZachXBT highlights in his analysis that the transfers were anonymized using the Mixing Service, but a potential link between the funds and earlier dark web transactions can still be traced through the association pattern of input/output addresses. This is not a simple “donation”, but a planned asset movement that may be related to outstanding legal disputes or asset confiscation procedures. He marked the law enforcement records of the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in his tweet, suggesting that the authorities might intervene in the investigation.
Legal dispute: The ownership of assets is in doubt
Ubrich was sentenced to life imprisonment in 2013 for operating the Silk Road, and his assets (including Bitcoin) were seized and auctioned by the US government. However, the 300 bitcoins transferred this time did not appear in the previously made public judicial documents, which has sparked speculation about the legal ownership of the assets. Legal experts point out that if the funds are indeed the “escaped fish” of Ubrich that have not been seized, the US government may assert ownership through the Civil Confiscation of Assets Act. Conversely, if the transferor is a third party, there may be suspicion of money laundering or assisting in the transfer of criminal assets.
Sean Ambrose, an analyst at cryptocurrency compliance platform Elliptic, said: “The traceability cycle for dark web assets is typically over a decade. This transfer could be part of a ‘phishing’ operation by law enforcement agencies or an attempt by a third party to test regulatory responses through ‘dormant addresses’.” He added that similar operations had also occurred in the “Silk Road 2.0” case in 2024, which ultimately ended with the confiscation of all the involved assets.
Market impact: The inflow of antique coins may trigger fluctuations
The sudden flow of 300 “antique Bitcoins” has also raised market concerns about the price. Historical data shows that when the US Department of Justice auctioned off 98,000 bitcoins seized along the Silk Road in 2023, it led to a short-term 5% drop in BTC. The Bitcoin transferred this time is regarded as a “high-risk asset” by some investors due to its special circulation history. If it enters the secondary market, it may trigger selling pressure.
However, on-chain data shows that the receiving address is still locked at present and no transfer has been made to the exchange. Cryptocurrency trader “CryptoWhale” analyzed on Twitter: “If funds are used for money laundering, they are usually sold through multiple layers of mixed coins and decentralized exchanges. However, there are no such signs on the chain at present. It is more likely to be an ‘evidence preservation’ operation by law enforcement agencies.”
Regulatory signal: The investigation of dark web assets continues to escalate
This incident once again highlights the regulatory authorities’ efforts to track down criminal assets related to cryptocurrencies. Since 2025, the US Department of Justice has launched the “Crypto Asset Enforcement Initiative 2.0”, focusing on cracking down on dark web transactions, money laundering and sanctions evasion. The federal prosecutor’s office hinted in a statement that it will launch an investigation into the transfer. “Any attempt to hide or transfer criminal assets, regardless of the interval, will face legal accountability.”
With the upgrade of on-chain analysis tools such as Chainalysis, the anonymity of dark web assets is gradually being undermined. Data shows that in 2024, the global trading volume of dark web cryptocurrencies decreased by 62% year-on-year, and the value of related assets seized by law enforcement agencies exceeded 1.2 billion US dollars, setting a new historical record. ZachXBT reminds investors: “Stay away from any transactions related to illegal addresses. The ‘historical stain’ of antique coins may result in account freezing or asset confiscation.”
Related topic: